Mom of Murdered Obama Gay Lover Speaks Up

Posted by USAHM News on December 18, 2010
Fellowship of Minds

In late May, Wash. DC-based investigative journalist Wayne Madsen had a bombshell revelation about Obama’s membership in a Chicago gay club, Man’s Country. Madsen also reported on Obama’s sexual relationships with other men, including named D.C. politicians and Donald Young, the openly-gay choir-director of the church in Chicago of which Obama was a member for some 20 years — Jeremy Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ black liberation theology. Obama’s relationship with Young was confirmed by Larry Sinclair, who claims to have had two sex-cocaine trysts with Obama.

There were two other openly gay men in Wright’s church: Larry Bland and Nate Spencer. In late 2007, as Obama began his ascent to be the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, in a span of 1½ months, all three men “conveniently” died:

• Bland was murdered execution-style on November 17, 2007;
• Young was murdered execution-style on December 24, 2007;
• Spencer reportedly died of septicemia, pneumonia, and HIV on December 26, 2007. (Death certificates of Bland and Young, HERE.)

Now, Young’s elderly mother is speaking out about her suspicions that her son was murdered to protect Obama’s reputation and assure his political future as President.

~Eowyn

White House ramps up damage control over Obama Chicago gay history

An exclusive Wayne Madsen Report – July 19, 2010

The story about President Barack Obama’s bi-sexual past will not go away. Now, in an exclusive interview withThe Globe, Norma Jean Young, the 76-year old mother of the late Trinity United Church of Christ choir director Donald Young, has spoken out and declared that persons trying to protect Obama murdered her son at the height of the 2007 Democratic presidential primary to protect Obama from embarrassing revelations about his homosexual relationship with her son. Donald Young’s bullet-ridden body was found in his Chicago apartment on December 23, 2007, in what appeared to be an assassination-style slaying.

Norma Jean Young revealed to The Globe that her son Donald, who was openly gay, was a “close friend” of Obama. Mrs. Young also believes the Chicago Police Department has not placed a high priority on finding the killers of her son. Mrs. Young, who is, herself a former employee of the Chicago Police Department, toldThe Globe that, “There is more to the story,” adding, “I do believe they are shielding somebody or protecting someone.”

The Globe’s revelations are consistent with information obtained by WMR during a May investigation conducted in Chicago. On May 24, WMR reported:“President Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel are lifetime members of the same gay bath house in uptown Chicago, according to informed sources in Chicago’s gay community, as well as veteran political sources in the city.” The report added, “WMR spoke to several well-placed sources in Chicago who reported that Jeremiah Wright, the pastor of Obama’s former church of 20 years, Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC) on Chicago’s south side, ran what was essentially a matchmaking service for gay married black professional members of the church, including lawyers and businessmen, particularly those with children. The matchmaking club was called the ‘Down Low Club’ but references to it over the phone and email simply referred to the group with the code phrase ‘DLC.’ The ruse, according to our sources, was to make anyone who was eavesdropping on the communications [FBI wiretaps in the Rod Blagojevich case likely contain such references] believe that the references were to the Democratic Leadership Council, also known as the DLC . . . Among the members of the gay ‘DLC’ were Obama and TUCC’s choir director, Donald Young, an openly gay man who reportedly had a sexual relationship with Obama. Two other gay members of the church were Larry Bland and Nate Spencer. Young and Bland were brutally murdered, execution style, in late 2007. Bland was murdered on November 17, 2007 and Young on December 24, 2007. The latter was killed by multiple gunshot wounds. Spencer reportedly died on December 26, 2007, official cause of death: ‘septicemia, pneumonia, and HIV.’”

Larry Sinclair, the gay man who claimed to have had two sexual encounters with Obama in Chicago in 1999, wrote a book, “Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder,” in which he states that Obama was linked to Young’s murder. Sinclair wrote that he was in contact with Young shortly before his murder and Young revealed his relationship with Obama. At the time of his revelations about Obama at a National Press Club news conference, WMR doubted the veracity of Sinclair’s story due to the absence of corroborating evidence coupled with a bizarre news conference. However, since that time, WMR has received corroboration from a number of sources in a number of locations, including Chicago, Alabama, Georgia, and Washington, DC. WMR has received information that various competing camps, including the Hillary Clinton and John McCain campaigns, attempted to co-opt Sinclair and his revelations for their own political purposes. Sinclair, it should be noted, has not deviated from his original story or charges against Obama.

On June 19, 2008, WMR reported: “WhiteHouse.com held a news conference following Sinclair’s at which a video of Sinclair’s polygraph was to be shown. After experiencing technical difficulties with the video presentation, Parisi abruptly canceled the news conference and took no questions.” The aborted news conference was as bizarre as Sinclair’s. Sinclair was arrested by Washington, DC police following his news conference based on a warrant from Delaware issued by Vice President candidate Joseph Biden’s son, Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden. The Delaware charges against Sinclair were later dropped.

http://usahitman.com/mom-of-murdered-obama-gay-lover-speaks-up/

Senate Blocks Bill for Illegal Immigrant Students

By DAVID M. HERSZENHORN

Published: December 18, 2010

The Senate on Saturday blocked a bill that would create a path to citizenship for certain illegal immigrant students who came to the United States as children, completed two years of college or military service and met other requirements including passing a criminal background check. The vote, 55-41 in favor of the bill, effectively kills the measure for this year, and its fate beyond that is uncertain.

Most immediately, the measure would have helped grant legal status to hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrant students and recent graduates whose lives are severely restricted because they are illegal residents, though many have lived in the United States for nearly their entire lives.

Young Hispanic men and women filled the spectator galleries of the Senate, many of them wore graduation caps and tassels in a symbol of their support for the bill. And they held hands in a prayerful gesture as the clerk called the roll .

The measure, known as the Dream Act, failed to get the support of 60 senators needed to cut off a filibuster and bring the bill to the floor.

President Obama had personally lobbied lawmakers in support the bill. But Democrats were not able to hold ranks. Among those voting no were Senators Ben Nelson, Democrat of Nebraska, Mark Pryor, Democrat of Arkansas, Jon Tester, Democrat of Montana.

“I want to make it clear to my colleagues, you won’t get many chances in the United states Senate, in the course of your career, to face clear votes on the issue of justice,” said Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, and a main champion of the immigration measure.

Mr. Durbin urged support for the measure.

“Thousands of children in American who live in the shadows and dream of greatness,” he said. “they are children who have been raised in this country. They stand in the classrooms and pledge allegiance to our flag. They sing our star-spangled banner as our national anthem. They believe in their heart of hearts this is home. This is the only country they have every know.”

But opponents of the measure said it was too broad and would great amnesty to illegal immigrants.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/us/politics/19immig.html

North American Union: Why the U.S. coverup? Merging the US, Canada & Mexico Together!

PREMEDITATED MERGER

Memory hole? Obama administration replaces content of official website

Posted: December 17, 2010

10:45 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Operating much like a "memory hole" in George Orwell's classic novel "1984," the Obama administration has replaced the content of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America website, providing additional evidence the White House intends to implement the SPP agenda by executive action, below the radar of public opinion and outside the framework of congressional approval.

The SPP website, under the title "Commerce Connect," now reflects totally different content, announcing its purpose as "a one-stop shop for information, counseling and government services that can help U.S. businesses around the country transform themselves into globally competitive enterprises."

Currently, the URL spp.gov yields the following content:

The following screen capture reflects the content of spp.gov as of June 28, 2008, the last day the original content of that URL was archived by The Wayback Machine.

WND reported in September 2009 that the Obama administration has "rebranded" and "refocused" the Security andProsperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, to advance the Bush administration's agenda of North American integration under the rubric of the "North American Leaders Summit," a less controversial banner, according to confidential sources in the U.S. Department of Commerce and State Department who agreed to speak with WND only if their comments were kept off the record.

Beginning in September 2009, the SPP website included a disclaimer that read: "This website is an archive for SPP documents and will not be updated."

Still, even in September 2009, the SPP website maintained the appearance it had when it was launched April 15, 2005, and it continued to carry an extensive set of documents that since have been scrubbed from the Internet, including Web pages describing the SPP's "prosperity agenda," its "security agenda," and a comprehensive list of SPP working groups.

Currently, clicking the URLs for these SPP documents produces a Commerce Connect page that says, "404 Page Not Found. The page you are looking for is currently unable to view."

For example, here is the current result when the URL that previously contained the SPP prosperity agenda is searched today:

In September 2009, sources confirmed to WND that the SPP was being directed from within the White House, as reflected by a new blog posted on the White House website entitled "The North American Leaders Summit" that is intended to replace SPP.gov as the official website documenting trilateral government activities going forward under the rebranded name.

Currently, the White House blog for the North American Leaders Summit contains content that appears not to have changed since that site first appeared, sometime around September 2009.

Here is the White House blog page for the North American Leaders Summit as it appears now:

The White House's handling of the SPP agenda sharply contrasts with Canada, where the SPP website retains its original character, openly proclaiming North American community objectives, much like the U.S. website spp.gov did prior to September 2009.

The Canadian government website today continues to archive the security agenda, the prosperity agenda, trilateral meeting summaries going back to 2007 and key SPP reports and documents – all content that has been scrubbed from current U.S. government websites.

The current Obama administration strategy appears to be to keep the trilateral working groups meeting privately, with a determination to put in place key policy objectives of the SPP working groups as defined under the administration of President George W. Bush, without openly acknowledging the intention to do so.

Earlier this week, WND reported that on Nov. 30, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano signed a "Trusted Traveler" agreement with Mexico, thereby implementing a primary objective of the SPP Transportation Policy working group under President Bush, namely to open the U.S. border to approximately 84 million Mexican citizens by issuing biometric "trusted traveler" cards that Mexicans entering the U.S. can swipe through ATM-like "Global Entry" kiosks at some 20 international airports in the United States.

WND also reported that the U.S. State Department is moving to create a continental border around the U.S. as the relevant national security perimeter, thereby erasing the borders between the U.S. and Mexico and between the U.S. and Canada.

The agreements are documented in a March 23 State Department memo titled "United States-Mexico Partnership: A New Border Vision," and a draft document with Canada titled "Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for PerimeterSecurity and Competitiveness," a draft copy of which has been obtained by CTV News in Canada.

WND has reported since 2006 that a blueprint published in 2005 by the Council on Foreign Relations entitled "Building a North America Community" called for the establishment of a common security perimeter around North America by 2010 to facilitate the free movement of people, trade and capital between the three nations of North America.

In his 2001 book "Toward a North American Community," American University Robert Pastor, a co-chair of the CFR blue ribbon committee that authored "Building a North American Community," called for the creation of a NorthAmerican Commission, a North American Parliament, and a North American Court on Trade and Investment.

The language of the documents declaring "A New Border Vision" with Mexico and Canada could easily have been lifted directly from the CFR report or Pastor's book.

The 2005 CFR report "Building a North American Community," called on page xvii of the foreword for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security perimeter, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter."

WND has frequently reported, beginning in 2006, the SPP in the administration of President Bush appeared designed to replicate the steps taken in Europe over a 50-year period following the end of World War II to transform an economic agreement under the European Common Market into a full-fledged regional government, the European Union, with its own currency.

The concern was that under the SPP the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, could evolve into a regional government, the North American Union, with a regional currency, the amero, replacing the U.S. dollar, the Mexican peso and the Canadian dollar.

WND has reported analysts have believed the North American integration plan will proceed incrementally, largely below the radar, since the SPP was declared "dead" by one of its chief architects, American University Professor Robert A. Pastor, who for nearly 15 years has been a major proponent of building a "North American Community."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240621

Conspiracy Theory with Gov. Jesse Ventura- 911 Pentagon Attack

GORDON DUFF: GOV. JESSE VENTURA PROVES 9/11 COVER-UP, WILL AMERICA’S GOVERNMENT FALL?

FORMER VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY ACCUSED OF ENGINEERING PENTAGON ATTACK

DONALD RUMSFELD CITED AS POSSIBLE ACCOMPICE

Jesse Blows the "official story" of the pentagon attacks on 9-11-2001 wide open. Aired 12-17-2010

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

Confirmed sources in the Nigerian government tell us, in order to keep former Vice President Cheney out of prison for crimes involving Nigeria, $500,000,000 in bribes have been promised, negotiated by former President George H.W. Bush.   Now, only a day later, Cheney faces possible charges, so many charges they can only be imagined, for planning the Pentagon attack on 9/11.  TV host, Jesse Ventura, former Navy Seal, former Governor of Minnesota, on a one hour documentary on prime-time American television, makes an open and shut criminal case tying Cheney, Rumsfeld and officials throughout the US government with complicity in the planning, execution and subsequent cover-up of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon.

"thought it was a bomb...walked out through the hole..

burning wreckage..no plane parts...threatened to keep silent"

According to experts on 9/11, engineers, pilots, intelligence officers and members of our military, Jesse Ventura “hit the nail on the head.”  Ventura, using evidence developed over 9 years by hundreds of individuals, outlines the utter impossibility of the government’s cover story on 9/11 and systematically debunks it using testimony and scientific evidence.

Ventura cites, in an interview with a 9/11 commissioner, a possible motive for the Pentagon attack being included with the attacks on the World Trade Center.  $2,300,000,000,000, yes 2.3 billion US dollars had disappeared, cited only the day before in a televised statement by Secretary Rumsfeld, money “gone missing” from the Pentagon’s accounting.  The are of the Pentagon hit by a missile or destroyed by explosives or both contained all records of this missing money.

NO PLANE, NO WAY, NOT EVEN CLOSE

Ventura proves, beyond any doubt that no airplane every hit the Pentagon.  As the video shows, not even a highly trained airline pilot was capable of the maneuvers claimed.  Long before, it had been proven that the 757 was incapable the task, either the maneuvers or the speed and trajectory.  The plane would have come apart, there is no disagreement with this and hasn’t been for some time, yet nothing had been done.  Why?

It is also clearly shown that there is absolutely no evidence of any kind showing a plane hit the Pentagon, no wreckage, no bodies, no luggage.  Items claimed to have been taken to Dover Air Force Base, bodies, plane parts, were never at the Pentagon as both video and testimony prove.

There is also proof that the government threatened witnesses, telling them to support the “aircraft scenario.”

NO MUSLIMS, NO HIJACKERS, NO BOX CUTTERS, ALL PROVEN LIES FINALLY

The basis for the conspiracy theory regarding Muslim hijackers with box cutters was based on supposed phone calls made by Barbara Olson, wife of Bush Solicitor General.  Solicitor General Olson claimed he talked to his wife on a cell phone, spoke with her at length, while she described the hijackings as now dramatized by Hollywood.  When it was proven that a cell phone is incapable of making such calls, Olson claimed it was a “seat back phone.”  When it was proven that there were no seat back phones on American Airlines 757 aircraft, nothing further was asked.

Then investigations shows he received one call, lasting “0″ seconds.  Ventura questions as to whether Olson was duped or complicit?  Should he be arrested too?  Was his wife, Barbara, ever really on the plane?

Then Ventura looks into the flight itself.  Not only was the flight recorder “dead” but during the flight itself, the transponder was turned off.  Even more suspicious, the plane disappeared from radar for 28 minutes.

There is no discussion of this 28 minutes, but speculation, perhaps no longer speculation, has long been that the flight landed.  As to what happened then, we cannot guess, or can we.  One of my friends, a former Pentagon official, had a friend on that aircraft.  Not long ago, he asked me.

“Gordon, what do you think happened to him, do you think he was executed?  Bullet in the brain as they stepped off the plane or something even worse?”

Ventura didn’t go there.  None of us want to.  It requires visualizing a scene out of Auschwitz.

Can Americans be so brutal, so devious, so traitorous?  It isn’t just Jesse Ventura that is willing to risk his life to bring it out, Fox News journalist Geraldo Rivera, several weeks ago, debunked the Building 7 collapse at the World Trade Center as “controlled demolition.”

YouTube - Veterans Today -

9/11 COMMISSION DUPED, ADMITS THERE WAS NO REAL INVESTIGATION AT ALL

Commission video’s redacted to remove testimony by the Secretary of Transportation, transcripts altered, witnesses blocked, evidence, tons of evidence of government conspiracy withheld, this is the case against the government.  Threats, intimidation, going on for years, this is proven.  Were there more than threats, murders, “heart attacks” or threats against families?  Ventura proves the Pentagon was a government conspiracy, he “names names.”  Geraldo makes any other explanation for Building 7 other than “controlled demolition” pure insanity.

IGNORING EVIDENCE, PROOF OF DICTATORSHIP OR ARE ARRESTS PLANNED?

It isn’t as though the evidence presented by Governor Ventura and Geraldo Rivera or even the other stories, Judge Napolitano’s revelations of knowledge of the attacks as early as 9/11, was new.  All has been know, all highly credible and all systematically ignored, attacked by the press, suppressed by courts, officials at every level.

9/11 and the recent revelations aren’t proof of a conspiracy by 2 men, or Israel.  It is proof that there never was an Al Qaeda and that the deaths, two wars, the 9/11 deaths and the carnage across the world wrought by the United States was part of a criminal conspiracy, one that could only be perpetrated by a dictatorship under the guise of representative democracy.

Everything we have seen, and millions around the world have watched, nobody can ignore it anymore, it all says that what has happened is something no American would allow, not if this still were America.  Jesse Ventura proved something startling to most, suspected by some.  He proved that, at some point in our past, 10 years, more, we don’t know, our government was overthrown.

Everything since then, certainly 9/11 and now, the news about Iran and, especially Wikileaks, all subterfuge.  When former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinsky cited Wikileaks on a PBS interview, televised nationally, that Wikileaks was the word of an intelligence agency, Israel never reported it or responded.  Instead, they attributed Brzezinski’s quote to me:

“Speaking to Haaretz, Duff added that ‘it sticks out like a sore thumb that WikiLeaks is obviously concocted by an intelligence agency.’”

This is what Brzezinski told Judy Woodruff of PBS:

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: But I think the most serious issues are not those which are getting the headlines right now. Who cares if Berlusconi is described as a clown. Most Italians agree with that. Who cares if Putin is described as an alpha dog? He probably is flattered by it.

The real issue is, who is feeding Wikipedia on this issue — Wiki — Wiki — WikiLeaks on this issue? They’re getting a lot of information which seems trivial, inconsequential, but some of it seems surprisingly pointed. …The very pointed references to Arab leaders could have as their objective undermining their political credibility at home, because this kind of public identification of their hostility towards Iran could actually play against them at home.

It’s, rather, a question of whether WikiLeaks are being manipulated by interested parties that want to either complicate our relationship with other governments or want to undermine some governments, because some of these items that are being emphasized and have surfaced are very pointed.

And I wonder whether, in fact, there aren’t some operations internationally, intelligence services, that are feeding stuff to WikiLeaks, because it is a unique opportunity to embarrass us, to embarrass our position, but also to undermine our relations with particular governments.

BUSH, OBAMA, CONTINUING DICTATORSHIP, CONTINUING COVER-UP, CONTINUING WAR

Barak Obama ran for president on a platform based on justice, ending the wars and bringing accountability to government after 8 years of scandals, deceit and what can only be called “hooliganism and piracy.”  Instead, he has done nothing, the wars continue, drugs are flowing from Afghanistan even faster than before, 9/11 evidence, now overwhelming and impossible ignore is still ignored.

Americans looking for reform wonder if Bush left at all.  Those complicit are, though few admit it, disturbed by seeing America led by an African American.  The visible public face on the very well financed attacks on President Obama are all very much based on race hatred.  Who would want a return to policies enacted by the least successful president in American history, George W. Bush, who left office with an approval record listed at 22%.  Many would find a number lower, even half, more credible.  President Clinton, after surviving impeachment for lying about sexual misconduct left office with 68% approval.

Even through the assaults on President Obama, many financed by the Koch brothers,  tied to ultra-nationalists in Israel, whether there was a real change of government is not clear.  As Jesse Ventura pointed out, while Vice President Dick Cheney was getting reports of a plane approaching the Pentagon, seemingly even orchestrating the attack himself, President Bush was in Florida reading to school children.  Two years of Obama have been similar, too similar.

What can we assume from this?  Is, in fact, the President of the United States no longer Commander in Chief?  Did our government hand itself over to “shadow” rule with Bush or did it happen earlier, after President Reagan’s dementia made him unable to manage the cabal that surrounded him?

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/18/gordon-duff-gov-jesse-ventura-proves-911-cover-up-will-americas-government-fall/

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration would be working with the U.N. to pass a new “GLOBAL gun control."

Dear Concerned American,
With willing one-world accomplices in Washington, D.C., gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.
In fact, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just announced the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove with the U.N. to pass a new “Small Arms Treaty."
Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates,” the U.N.’s Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.


If passed by the U.N. and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the U.N.’s Small Arms Treaty would almost certainly FORCE national governments to:
Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;
CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);
BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;


Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.
Are you outraged?  Do you want answers?  Then please scroll down and fill out the Firearms Sovereignty Survey the National Association for Gun Rights has prepared for you putting yourself squarely on record AGAINST the U.N. Small Arms Treaty!
Once you submit your survey, please consider a generous donation of $100, $50 or $25 to the National Association for Gun Rights so we can fight for your gun rights and defeat the U.N. Small Arm's Treaty.


Sincerely,


Congressman Paul Broun, M.D.


http://www.nagr.org/UN_lp_survey2.aspx?pid=key02&gclid=CPHxiOnu9KUCFRZ-5QodcDIAqA

THE CALL FOR A MILITARY COUP brings the prospect of martial law in America

TWO RECENT CALLS for a military coup brings the prospect of martial law in America into a singular and fresh perspective.

In 2007, black political analyst, Thomas Sowell, lamenting the undermining of traditional values and the promotion of diversity in America by politicians, educators, and media moguls, remarked, “I can’t help wondering if the day may yet come when the only thing that can save this country is a military coup.”

Two years later, former adviser to the Carter administration, John L Perry, outlined the possibility that America’s military could “intervene” as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.”

Backed by financier Richard Mellon Scaife, the musing Perry appealed to the Constitution to suggest the legality of a military coup:

“Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled on.

These officers swear to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to obey the orders of the president.” View Entire Story Here.

In a recent interview, Ex-Green Beret Joe Cortina, put forth that Congress has placed itself under the yoke of International Jewry and its Jewish-American agents at home.

Thus, Cortina argues, because Capitol Hill has subverted the military oath to defend the Constitution against “foreign and domestic enemies,” the military is under no obligation to obey a civilian authority that has been usurped by Jewish interests acting as agents of a foreign state.

In fact, President John F Kennedy and Attorney General Robert Kennedy attempted to have the American Zionist Council, (the parent organization of AIPAC), registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, but the power of Jewry was stronger than these two high ranking and powerful executive officers.

TRASHING THE CONSTITUTION

MILLIONS OF AMERICANS, although oblivious to the Jewish takeover of America, are awakening to the trashing of the US Constitution as protested by the Tea Party movement.

And with the increasing disgust with the elitism of the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Bank, popular support of Ron Paul, now head of the House Monetary Policy Subcommittee,giving clout to his war on the Fed, is at an all time high.

But what the “Constitution lovers” fail to recognize is that with 99.9% of our politicians having sold their souls to Jewish money — and with three Jews serving on the Supreme Court — the prospect for “ending the Fed” or “restoring the Constitution” is impossible.

Thus, the call for a military coup takes on a whole new favorable face.

For the feasibility of the Officer Corps shutting down the Fed, canceling all debts on the grounds of the Fed lending counterfeit money, and establishing a National Bank that coins its own money, lends a pleasing savor to the prospect of a military restoration of America.

HITLER’S HISTORICAL PRECEDENT

WHEN HITLER CAME TO POWER IN 1933, Germany was bankrupt and plaguedby high unemployment while hyper-inflation had depleted its national Treasury.

Germany had no choice but to resign itself to what was imposed upon them by the Versailles Treaty — debt slavery under international Jewish bankers.

But in 1933, when the National Socialists were elected by popular vote, the much-loved Fuhrer freed the Germans from the Jewish yoke.

Hitler began a public works program wherein workers were paid certificates of credit which were essentially receipts for labor delivered to the government. Hitler said, “For every mark issued, we require the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work.”

These receipts, called “Labor Treasury Certificates,”(not unlike the currency framework of Alexander Hamilton’s credit system and Lincoln’s greenbacksolution), thwarted international Jewry’s monetary system, (not unlike the Fed’s currency arrangementnow plaguing America.)

Hitler’s revival of the nation’s economy was short-lived due to Jewry’s declaring a global boycott of Germany and enlisting a universal revenge on German independence from its control. View Entire Story Here, Here, & Here.

Indeed, while the allies enjoyed a military victory over the German uprising against Jewry, the political victory of Jewish hegemony over Europe and America solidified.

But, a “military & political victory” in the form of a coup, liberating America from its slavery to Jewry, could bring fresh hopes to a nation in economic collapse and deep internal crisis…

JOE CORTINA IS AN EX GREEN BERET, a former airborne special operations officer and US Army Training Center commander.

Joe Cortina’s subsequent experiences as an intelligence investigator andanti-terrorist adviser brought him to such hotbeds of turmoil as the State of Israel, adjacent Middle East nations, and Central America.

Joe Cortina’s Web Site, “My Name Is Joe Cortina,” is a showcase of crimes committed against humanity by the Zionist global elite. Here.

________________________

Br Nathanael: Could the US military counter the unchallenged power of organized Jewry?

Joe Cortina: Absolutely. But the question is not “if” - rather, “would they?” WILL the US military rise to the task?

Br Nathanael: What specifically is that task?

Joe Cortina: There exists in our nation a highly organized force — American Jewry — which can only be countered by another highly organized force — the US Military.

The predicament facing the military is that in their submission to the civilian authority they are actually subservient to American Jewry and NOT to a responsible civilian leadership pursuing America’s interests rather than the Jewish community’s.

Br Nathanael: How is the US military subservient to the Jews?

Joe Cortina: Both Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court have failed to preserve this country’s “independence and sovereignty” by protecting it from domestic intruders and a foreign occupation.

We are currently under the yoke of a usurping Zionist occupation in all three branches of our government which is headquartered in Tel Aviv. The agents of this occupying power are Jews who head up the multitude of Jewish Lobbies in America such as AIPAC and the ADL.

We are willing to take a fight to perceived enemies halfway around the world. But what about that part of the oath that specifically includes DOMESTIC ENEMIES?

DOMESTIC ENEMIES
Br Nathanael: What oath do soldiers take?

Joe Cortina: It is the solemn oath to defend our Constitution against ALL enemies - both foreign AND domestic. In this case, we’re dealing with a domestic enemy, organized Jewry.

Br Nathanael: What happens to a traditional civilian authority under this Jewish power?

Joe Cortina: The civilian authority that the military is NOW subservient to is dominated by agents of a foreign power.

These Jewish agents are treasonous dual-citizens whose useful idiots are apostate Christian Zionists. Their allegiance is to the State of Israel and it’s global networks of Zionist Federations and affiliated Jewish organizations. The Jews who run Wall Street are the financiers behind this Zionist network.

Br Nathanael: Would a military coup to overturn this spurious civilian authority be possible?

Joe Cortina: Granted, only one time in US history has the military contemplated a coup.

This was to halt the New Deal drafted by FDR’s court Jews, Frankfurter, Morgenthau, and Baruch.

The plot failed when General Smedley Butler who led the coup went public.

The strength behind the military’s reticence lies in the time-honored American tradition that regardless of personal beliefs every soldier is charged with being responsible to the civilian authority. This is the stranglehold the Jews presently have on our military.

However, the US Armed Forces are, in fact, unconstitutionally obedient to domestic agents of a foreign civilian leadership acting solely in the interests of global Jewry. Indeed, a precedentwas set during the Roosevelt era for a military coup against Jewry’s power.

A ‘DELICATE’ POSSIBILITY

Br Nathanael: The prospect of a military coup is perhaps an odious thought is it not?

Joe Cortina: Such an event may not be the greatest thing in the world, but would certainly be better than what is going on now. And it’s not unlikely. I would say it’s a ‘delicate’ possibility.

Interestingly, a senior fellow of the pro-military Hoover Institute, one Thomas Sowell, wrote a piece for the National Review on the decline of American society which presented a very similar thought:

“When I see the worsening degeneracy in our politicians, our media, our educators, and our intelligentsia, I can’t help wondering if the day may yet come when the only thing that can save this country is a military coup.”

Br Nathanael: Wouldn’t a military coup go against what is ingrained in every US soldier?

Joe Cortina: Under the present circumstances, a military “uprising” wouldn’t actually be a coup at all — in that it is not overthrowing a Constitutional government — but rather, it would be an effort to restore the government from the Jews to true American citizens.

And a military coup does not necessarily have to be de jure but de facto.

DE FACTO COUP
Br Nathanael: How would it be a de facto coup?

Joe Cortina: America is now kept afloat by a military economy. The arms industry is all that is left of our manufacturing scenario.

The military has tremendous economic influence and has a powerful Lobby almost as influential as that of the Jews.

Once the military takes control of the media, which would occur during a ‘national emergency,’ then American Jewry will have a formidable opponent.

Br Nathanael: Do you see any movement within the military that presages a possible military coup?

Joe Cortina: There IS a growing counterpoise to the Israel Lobby by leading military figures.

Though I agree with Admiral Fallon that General Petraeus is nothing but an “ass kisser,” he warned in a Pentagon briefing last winter that “Israeli intransigence on the Israel-Palestinian conflict is jeopardizing US standing in the Middle East.”

Even though Petraeus made this statement to advance his own ambitions and in no way is he jealous for American interests, the Jewish-owned press gave it little coverage.

I’m certain that the military brass took notice and were not pleased with the suppression of Patreaus’ statement.

ANTI-JEWISH AGENDA

Br Nathanael: Are there any other military figures who are showing impatience with Jewry’s control of American policies?

Joe Cortina: Yes, for one, and representative of a growing sentiment amongst the Officer Corps, is former Air Force General, Merrill “Tony” McPeak.

McPeak served as Obama’s military adviser during the 2008 campaign. But under pressurefrom the Jews, conveniently disappeared.

Br Nathanael: Any anti-Jewish statements from McPeak?

Joe Cortina: Indeed. In May of 2008, McPeak boldly blamed US Jews for “hindering peace” in the Middle East.”

Right smack in their faces, McPeak stated that the “problem” of our Middle East policy “rests in New York City and Miami.”

He added that the Jews “have a large vote in favor of Israel,” and that “no politician wants to run against it…you can’t develop a Middle East strategy, it’s impossible.” By the way, during Obama’s campaign, McPeak had the guts to call McCain “too fat!”

A BLOODLESS COUP?

Br Nathanael: Is a ‘bloodless’ coup possible?

Joe Cortina: Yes. After all, we’re talking about the recapturing of OUR OWN NATION - not some imperialistic endeavor.

I would think that if American citizens see that millions of active duty troops of all ranks are ready to sacrifice whatever it takes to be a free moral sovereign nation again, it’s a doable thing.

How could AIPAC or the ADL or any of Jewry’s organized gangsters stand up to millions of determined angry soldiers who simply want their COUNTRY RETURNED to THEM again?

The bottom line is that the US military may be the last vanguard against Jewish tyranny…

http://www.realjewnews.com/